The wonderful folks at LAD HQ have been gracious enough to allow me to post occasional articles and thoughts on their blog. That's a true honour, and whilst I understand that this blog is primarily a satirical blog, I wish to use my first post here to make a few points that, in light of recent events, need to be said with the utmost sincerity.
Now, before you go off thinking I'll be boring the bollocks off you every time I post, I can promise you that future contributions will be heavily peppered with silliness. For now, you'll just have to make do with this animated .gif of everyone's favourite decrepit tangerine, George Chittick, being smoulderingly sexy:
"Ye wanna do the bouncy...?"
Anyway, with that out of the way, it's down to business. Here we go.
The opening
of a new Irish language center in the predominantly Protestant East Belfast is
poignant for many reasons; not simply for the obvious, but also as a reflection
of a slowly emerging, broader change within the wider Protestant community. As
we normalise ourselves within the (admittedly) fragile peace the Good Friday
Agreement has given us, we learn more and more that many notions of old are
simply that – notions of old. They are constructs.
Antiquated ideas still fed to us by voices from a dark past. Ideas still used
as weapons of the mind.
One of these antiquated ideas that I'm talking about is thus: that any promotion of the Irish language and
culture is simply a front for the republican agenda towards reuniting Ireland.
It's easy to
understand why this generalisation is still fresh in the minds of many within
the PUL community. After all, the extremist republican movement has, in the
past, attempted (and in some ways, succeeded) to politicise the language for
their own gains – to instate themselves as the purveyors of “true” Irishness.
Today, this is perhaps most evident in the suggestion that the most Irish many in the
PUL community currently understand is "tiocfaidh ar la.”
Loyalist and
unionist hardliners have been happy to indulge this notion themselves, by
tarring everything remotely Irish with the same brush of republican terrorism. They
do this to galvanise the loyalist cause by promoting a fear of anything Irish within
their own community. They, like the hardline republicans, have politicised the
Irish language for their own gains also
.
.
These
constructs, meticulously cultivated from both sides throughout recent history,
have helped to disguise the true, historical relationship between the
Protestant people of the north of Ireland and the Irish language. We'll talk more on that in a bit.
A Foundation For Change
The last 14
months of bully-boy, boo-hoo bellyaching about the “slow dismantling of loyalist
culture” in the North from the DUP/Orange Order/loyalist collective have
disenfranchised said culture to many Protestants, who, being fed up of what they’ve
seen during this period, have perhaps decided to seek out for themselves
something else that truly represents them – and why not?
When we are told by hardliners that hate-fuelled flag burning and antagonism is “our culture,” we feel misrepresented deep in our bones. They say they speak for all of the Protestant people in today's North. They do not.
When we are told by hardliners that hate-fuelled flag burning and antagonism is “our culture,” we feel misrepresented deep in our bones. They say they speak for all of the Protestant people in today's North. They do not.
When hardline
loyalists talk about the idea of Protestant culture being dumbed down, they are
blurring lines. The true question is this
– is Protestant culture being dumbed down, or are the negative aspects of
loyalist culture being dumbed down? Hardliners may want us to believe the
notion that they are one and the same, but they are not.
Perhaps, in
light of recent events, there is an emerging desire for many Protestants to disassociate
from the “culture” they have been told over the years is their own, and to find
something more positive to connect to. Some, such as those who now attend Irish
classes in the Irish Language Center of East Belfast, have looked further back
into their lineage and been surprised at what they have discovered.
There is a deep
historical relationship between northern Protestants and the Irish language dating
back hundreds of years, all the way back to the Ascendancy landowners of the 1700s,
who used the language to communicate with their local tenants despite it being
outlawed by the English.
The Irish
language has been held in dear regard throughout much of Protestant involvement
in Ireland: from the United Irishmen, a revolutionary group founded by northern
Presbyterians to protect Ireland's interests (and led by the Protestant Wolfe Tone)
to the grandfather of modern unionism himself, Edward Carson, who was a fluent
Irish speaker and enthusiast.
Even post-partition, the unionist government of the new six-county state were very comfortable in using celtic regalia for their governmental crests and plaques, such as this design for the Parliamentary Library of Northern Ireland:
Even post-partition, the unionist government of the new six-county state were very comfortable in using celtic regalia for their governmental crests and plaques, such as this design for the Parliamentary Library of Northern Ireland:
Source: Ulster Scot FB page. Willie Frazer would have a fit.
It is this
oft-forgotten relationship that many loyalist hardliners wish to keep hidden, as
it contradicts their political aspirations. To keep the Protestant community polarised
from the Catholic community is to keep the Protestant people where hardliners such
as the DUP want them – a place where these zealous individuals can wield the
most power and fulfil their own small-minded, bigoted agendas.
As hardliner
support in today’s North slowly lessens, and we slowly free
ourselves from the constructs of conflict, more and more Protestants are now discovering
for themselves once again their Irish roots.
There is the
recent story of Protestant Linda Ervine – developer of the Irish Language
Center in East Belfast – who discovered that many in her family, alongside her
husband’s family, spoke fluent Irish prior to partition. Perhaps as more Protestants
seek to find and discover their own hidden relationship with the language, we
will see the true Protestant culture of the North emerge:
A culture that thrives on re-engagement with the proud historical contribution Protestants have made to Irish culture.
A culture centered on reconciliation with Catholic neighbours via rediscovered common interests, all founded in the principle of peace.
A culture that thrives on re-engagement with the proud historical contribution Protestants have made to Irish culture.
A culture centered on reconciliation with Catholic neighbours via rediscovered common interests, all founded in the principle of peace.
As the
culture of reconciliation becomes more apparent, the less the hardline brand of
hate-fuelled “culture” becomes relevant. Eventually, the notions of old will
fade away.
This isn’t
mere conjecture. As we emerge out of the ashes of the past, we are seeing this
change in action through the work of people like Linda Ervine. Perhaps one day we
can all, Protestant and Catholic, take a singular pride in our home through a
unified sense of cultural wellbeing.
We are, after
all, a part of Ireland that is a part of the UK.
Protestants
must disengage completely from the voices of old such as George Chittick, who bray with fire and
brimstone about how engagement with Irish culture is the “slippery slope”
towards a United Ireland. A United Ireland is completely irrelevant to this
discussion. Irish culture is, after all, as much a Protestant's culture as it is anyone
else’s on this island, regardless of the union with Great Britain.
Perhaps we should take a great pride in this together as one, and perhaps the North can stand tall as a proudly Irish part of the UK.
Perhaps we should take a great pride in this together as one, and perhaps the North can stand tall as a proudly Irish part of the UK.
I, myself, am
from a Protestant background, raised in the very north coast of County Derry. I am a proud Irishman from the North. I
am slowly learning to speak Irish myself, and I hope to be fluent someday.
I invite everyone from a Protestant background in the North to reacquaint themselves with our significant connection and contribution to Irish culture.
So whaddya say, fellas, fancy joining me on this journey?
I invite everyone from a Protestant background in the North to reacquaint themselves with our significant connection and contribution to Irish culture.
So whaddya say, fellas, fancy joining me on this journey?
To the heinous
bigotry that parades itself as “culture,” I hope, some day, we can all say bliain mhaith i do dhiaidh.
Best wishes,
-Dave McElfatrick
Best wishes,
-Dave McElfatrick
Sanity
ReplyDeleteOnly solution to the fragile peace process in dealing with those who wish to damage it, is to lock them up and throw away the key. The Yanks have Guantanamo Bay, supermax prisons across the country, Russia has prisons in the artic wastelands of Siberia. All we have is Maghaberry, time to shut those people up who have nothing to offer people in Northern/Republic Ireland.
ReplyDeleteTo fight over a fleg and rarely used languages Ulster-Scots and Gaelic is just stupid.
Can you lot Give My Head Peace.
Some ugly ideas there.
DeleteAbsolutely brilliant, well said Dave
ReplyDeleteI tried to find the Irish phrasing for "enjoy my behind" on google - I'll ask one of my Irish classmates tomorrow, then. From my position of a demi-irish living in the West with most of my family set in Enniskillen, the North, I applaud your message, your incomprehensible Irish and also the dick jokes.
ReplyDeleteYou killed it man, nice job!
ReplyDeleteTried to find the correct Irish phrasing for "enjoy my behind" on Google, sadly failed but shall ask Irish classmates tomorrow. Seems like a legitimate response to Sir "Eyebanger" Chittick.
ReplyDeleteAs a demi-Irish in the West, with most of my family in the North, all I can say to this is hell yeah. I hurrah your position, the development of closer ties to Irish language in the North and, also, the dick-jokes.
From my grim understanding of Irish, I took it to mean "good riddance". Sorry if I sound like a bumbling twit, but poor Irish is better than none at all, right?
DeleteGaelic isn't a rarely used language but it IS a language whereas Ulster-Scots is just a dialect.
ReplyDeleteI haven't discussed Ulster Scots in this post at all.
DeleteGaelic is not a rarely used language but it is an actual language whereas Ulster Scots is just a dialect masquerading as a language.
ReplyDeleteI appreciate and support the above effort to make a contribution toward ending the stupid, self-destructive sectarianism that blights our society. However, it helps no-one to perpetuate myths and half-truths that wrongly apportion blame and criticism - justly point the "finger of blame" at the NI state and not at either the Republic nor Loyalist communities as regards the Irish language and the promotion/rejection of 'Irish' identity.
ReplyDeleteFirstly, all Catholic schools teach the Irish language and promote Irish culture so it's misleading and divisive to advance the myth "Republicans politicised" the native Irish language within their own homeland - let's stop pretending the new NI "British Protestant and Unionist" state weren't making further efforts to marginalise and eventually eradicate all things Irish/Gaeilge.
Secondly - by contrast, since the inception of the N Ireland its state schools deprived Protestant children of the Irish language and avoided teaching them Irish History and Geography to any meaningfully "Irishness" standard; see 'Protestants and the Irish language...' http://cain.ulst.ac.uk/issues/language/pritchard04.htm
Finally, it's not the fault of Catholics/Republicans that Protestant children were deprived of access to a rich Irish culture that's theirs as much as any other inhabitant of this island. Again, blame not the deprived/marginalised or the oppressed community struggling to promote their Irish identity and culture in a bigoted oppressive state. Instead, blame the Unionist politicians who were running the NI state; read my blog post 'A Lost Tribe...' with plenty of sourced materials http://belfast-child.blogspot.co.uk/2013/11/ALostTribetheBritishinIreland.html
Well said, well said
ReplyDeleteGreat idea Pip, we should make our own Siberian Guantanamo Gulag. Locking up dissenting voices always works and is healthy for democracy.
ReplyDeleteI appreciate and support the above effort to make a contribution toward ending the stupid, self-destructive sectarianism that blights our society. However, it helps no-one to perpetuate myths and half-truths that wrongly apportion blame and criticism - justly point the "finger of blame" at the NI state and not at either the Republican nor Loyalist communities as regards the Irish language and the promotion/rejection of 'Irish' identity.
ReplyDeleteFirstly, all Catholic schools teach the Irish language, sports and culture so it's misleading and divisive to advance the myth "Republicans politicised" the native Irish language within their own homeland - let's stop pretending the British state didn't aggressively impose their foreign tongue and it was wholly legitimate for the Irish to strive to keep theirs alive within the new NI "British Protestant and Unionist" state who sought to further ignore or marginalise all things Irish/Gaeilge.
Secondly, Unionists must accept that since the inception of the N Ireland its state schools deprived their children of access to the Irish language and culture and avoided teaching them Irish History and Geography to any meaningfully "Irishness" standard; see 'Protestants and the Irish language...' http://cain.ulst.ac.uk/issues/language/pritchard04.htm
Finally, if you want positive changes in Ni then confront the reality of what the NI state was and continues to be under the governance of Unionist majority political parties; start by reading the sourced materials linked to my blog post 'A Lost Tribe...' http://belfast-child.blogspot.co.uk/2013/11/ALostTribetheBritishinIreland.html
Ruaidri, I appreciate your response. Indeed, I do agree that the unionist government failed in exposing the protestant community to the Irish language and culture, particularly in light of reading your post and researching further. I can only assume this was in part an effort to whitewash parts of history that didn't particularly work in their favour, particularly partition. Though Carson fought against home rule, primarily for Ulster, the partition of the island was not his intention, but rather the work of the English.
DeleteIt's worth discussing the idea of a 'blank canvas' that was provided to both De Valera and the unionist government in the foundation of both political entities on the island. On the one hand, partition allowed De Valera to realise his vision of a Catholic nation (seemingly channeling the words of D.P Moran in doing so) in the south, giving the Catholic Church a prominent position in the foundation of the state, whilst the unionist government went about the erection of a Protestant parliament for a Protestant people in the north. Both reactionary measures within the context of Ireland's turbulent history. That does not excuse one, or the other. It offers a vague explanation.
With that in mind, one must remember that the first time many Protestants in the north heard Irish during the latter half of the 20th-century, it was coming from the mouths of folk they associated with the armed struggle. Again, this is unfortunate circumstance.
To reaffirm your original point, that "Unionists must accept that since the inception of the N Ireland its state schools deprived their children of access to the Irish language and culture and avoided teaching them Irish History and Geography", I can attest to that. I attended a strongly protestant primary school, where the focus was on British history and British ideals, with no mention of Ireland as a whole, but plenty of talk about how the IRA were the villains. We learnt very little about the native culture. I then attended a Catholic school after that, and became very absorbed with what I now view as a common native heritage. I, however, equally recieved a D.P Moran-esque view that "Protestants cannot be Irish" within that school, a notion I reject completely.
I wish to educate both myself and others further that all of us native to this island are equally entitled to an Irish identity.
I forgot to mention that partition along sectarian lines essentially created the 'blank canvas' on both sides that I mention above. On the one side, we had a creation of a Catholic nation in response to the centuries of oppression suffered previously, and on the other side a Protestant nation created as a continuance of the ideal of Protestant dominance, harking back to the pious sense of superiority of the Ascendancy, on the other side.
DeleteTo me, as an agnostic, both morally questionable in this day and age, but history is what it is.
This comment has been removed by the author.
DeleteIt's not a myth to say republicans politicized Irish language (and culture). In the mid 19th century when the Celtic Revival was emerging it pretty much was engaged in by enthusiasts of all persuasions. Come the late 19th century with the formation of the Gaelic League (set up to promote the Irish language) and the GAA things soon became political. In fact the GL's founder Douglas Hyde later resigned as he believed the organisation was being used politically to promote the republican agenda. He wanted to keep culture and politics separate but it wasn't to be. Similar thing with the GAA which became cultural and political. I don't remember any unionist GAA clubs, and that's because there were none. Don't blame unionists for not joining, people with a unionist outlook simply weren't welcome, in fact some unionists were banned outright from joining.
DeleteWhen Sinn Fein's Danny Morrison says things like "Every word spoken in Irish is like a bullet fired in the struggle for Irish freedom", what he's actually saying there is you can't be pro-union and use the Irish language. In fact Irish should be used to attack unionists. Michael Collins said very similar things regarding the use of the language.
Are republicans solely to blame for unionist rejection of Irish? Of course not because for every Danny Morrison there is an idiot like George Chittick but it is certainly a sizeable factor. Sinn Fein use Irish culture to suit their agenda (as they are perfectly entitled to do) and just as unionist parties politicise Ulster Scots culture, (which i guess is also their right) but it doesn't help. It holds back acceptance of those cultures outside their own communities.
I'm glad to see unionists learning Irish. I think all unionists should be proud of their Irish side just as the great many nationalists with Scottish heritage should should explore and enjoy Ulster Scots culture, there is a lot of overlap between the two. It just doesn't help when the more tribal politicians use culture to their own ends.
You're right; fairly boring. You're right about wanting the Irish to Irish up though, I'll get behind you on that.
ReplyDelete